Search for: "Clarkson v. Wright"
Results 21 - 37
of 37
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2012, 5:19 am
Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes (A Partnership), heard 17 – 20 January 2012. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 2:16 pm
Wright and Moore v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 4:05 am
Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes (A Partnership), heard 17 – 20 January 2012. [read post]
26 May 2010, 1:20 pm
In Clarkson v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 9:08 am
Summary The EAT has issued a decision in the well-known and long-running retirement case of Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes, which dealt with the question: Was the retirement age of 65 PROPORTIONATE to achieve the firm’s stated aims of retention of staff and workforce planning? [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:15 am
Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes (A Partnership), heard 17 – 20 January 2012. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 2:26 am
Leslie Seldon Age discrimination is a topical for employment lawyers at the moment because this week the Supreme Court is hearing the case of Seldon v Clarkson Wright & Jakes, another age discrimination case which will (hopefully) give guidelines on the circumstances in which it is permissible for an employer to require an employee or, in this case, a Partner in a law firm to retire. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 2:32 pm
Leslie Seldon, who spent 35 years at the law firm of Clarkson Wright & Jakes (CWJ), has appealed against the Employment Tribunal’s (EAT's) decision that the firm was justified in mandatorily retiring him at 65; the EAT has just been hearing his appeal. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:22 am
Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes (A Partnership), heard 17 – 20 January 2012. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm
The editor of The Spectator has criticised the press regulator IPSO for upholding the complaint against The Sun over the Jeremy Clarkson column about Meghan Markle. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:19 am
On 20 December 2022, Chamberlain J heard costs applications in Wright v McCormack. [read post]
8 May 2012, 8:05 am
A recent decision of the Supreme Court in Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes (A Partnership) indicates that although it may be technically possible to justify a retirement age, an employer will be taking a big risk in attempting to do so (the Seldon case concerned a partnership but the same principles will apply in an employment case). [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 7:17 am
Key cases to look out for in 2012 Default Retirement Age and age discrimination (Seldon v Clarkson Wright & Jakes being heard with Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police). [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 5:28 am
Seldon v Clarkson Wright & Jakes was about age discrimination and it not being illegal to make partners retire at 65. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am
The press complaints handler IPSO has published its ruling on Jeremy Clarkson’s article in The Sun attacking Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, which prompted an unprecedented 25,100 complaints. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 12:19 pm
The King Law Reporter will be available on Fastcase.com for free through February 2018. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
