Search for: "Clausing v. K-Mart Corporation"
Results 1 - 7
of 7
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2011, 10:30 am
The Supreme Court also has weakened the ability of people to band together to challenge malfeasance of large corporations, see Wal-Mart v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 3:14 am
The contract between O'Connell Electric and K-Mart had an indemnification clause [FN1] and also a clause requiring that O'Connell Electric include K-Mart as an additional insured. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 9:33 pm
The company also paid a fixed amount for workers who used knives — so-called “K-Code time. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 13-1280Issue: (1) Whether the Court of Appeals erred in upholding the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation’s post hoc rationalization in litigation that, under 29 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 7:15 am
Scott 13-899Issue: (1) Whether the Fourth Circuit contravened Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 7:05 pm
Beyond Fragmentation Andrea K. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
For instance, there is no provision like Article 1, Section 8, clause 8 of the United States Constitution in any of the treaties establishing the TEU that protects intellectual property rights like the United States does.[39] While the ultimate goal is to harmonize all Member States in their approach to intellectual property rights, such a goal has not yet been entirely attained. [read post]
