Search for: "Clay v. Brand"
Results 1 - 20
of 41
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2019, 1:01 am
Brands’ book is part pure history, part biography. [read post]
28 May 2007, 11:26 pm
Per Clay v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 8:41 am
The Supreme Court issued its ruling in Magwood v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:02 am
Regardless, plaintiffs argued that they were entitled to strict scrutiny because required “sexually explicit” labels on video games had been struck down by the Seventh Circuit, and Brown v. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 6:40 am
The company is owned by Authentic Brands Group, which acquired the rights in 2013 from the Ali family. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:07 pm
Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 3:00 am
Clay v. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 11:15 am
Supreme Court denies cert to Chrimar v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 11:32 am
Banks v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 9:46 am
Islamic Republic of Iran, et al. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 5:49 am
Discount Tobacco City & Lottery, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Clay v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 11:17 pm
This is a case you gotta read.GRICE v. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 6:30 am
Varsity Brands. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 5:04 am
This means that we will not see another player in similar attire on the red clay in Paris any time soon. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 10:25 am
KG v Seng Fong Paints Pte Ltd [2019] SGIPOS 10, the Applicant, Seng Fong Paints Pte Ltd, applied to register the following marks (“the Application Marks”)Mark Specification (Class 2) Paints, coatings [paints]. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 8:46 am
Privacy * Winston Smith v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 3:50 am
In the STAYER trade mark dispute, Case T-254/13 Stayer Ibérica, SA v OHIM, ZAO Korporaciya ‘Masternet’, the General Court provided useful guidelines on how to assess and prove that branded goods are complementary or in competition for the purposes of establishing their similarity and possibly the existence of a likelihood of confusion between their trade marks.This case regards an application for invalidity lodged by the Russian company Zao Korporaciya Masternet… [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:15 am
Part II: Bans on advertisers’ own speech The court—now Judge Clay is back to speaking for the unanimous panel again—turned to restrictions on speech about “modified risk” tobacco products. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 8:37 am
Youngevity Int’l v. [read post]
