Search for: "Clay v. Johnson" Results 21 - 40 of 66
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2010, 8:38 am by Clare Freeman, RWS, WD Mich
Yesterday, the panel of Judges Martin, Cole, and Clay decided United States v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 2:27 pm by Viking
  General Court Marshal Convening Authority  (sic) Johnson v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 3:47 am by Russ Bensing
Johnson, the main one upholding the law, discussed here; Kaminski v. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 7:53 am by Joy Waltemath
Circuit Judge Eric Clay dissented (Loyd v Saint Joseph Mercy Oakland, September 10, 2014, Gilman, R). [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 3:45 am
  (Johnson, which I discussed in detail here,  extended Clay to the prior conviction subsection.) [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 3:54 am
Clay, the 8th District tossed searches which clearly ran afoul of Gant. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 5:19 am by Mark Graber
  Alvis, Bailey and Taylor note some minor legal differences between the defenses of congressional delegation theory advanced by Justice Louis Brandeis and James McReynolds in Myers v. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 11:45 pm by Aaron
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/826650.opn.pdf In her dissent, Chief Justice Madsen, joined by Justices Charles Johnson, James Johnson, and Fairhurst, argued that the majority treats the “routine process” used for excusing several potential jurors as a critical stage of the trial. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am by Wolfgang Demino
ONE MONTH INTO THE FIGHT OVER HEART AND SOUL NOT TO MENTION CONTROL OF THE CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAUDocket entry for 12/22 injunction hearing says "oral arguments heard. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am by Wolfgang Demino
ONE MONTH INTO THE FIGHT OVER HEART AND SOUL NOT TO MENTION CONTROL OF THE CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU Docket entry for 12/22 injunction hearing says "oral arguments heard. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 9:30 pm
Kentucky Attorney General Jack Conway is reviewing the state's 38 death row cases, including the two that initiated the Supreme Court challenge in Baze v. [read post]