Search for: "Clay v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 550
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2007, 5:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 9:46 am
The two cases decided by the Court yesterday in Swarthout v. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 1:53 pm
This is a reminder that while Baze v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 12:14 pm
The petitioners in that case, Elane Photography v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 9:21 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 8:53 am
The Supreme Court held that was to be considered a forfeiture clause if you apply the test established in Clays Lane Housing Co-operative Ltd v Patrick [1985] 17 HLR 188, and the lower courts had been wrong to conclude otherwise. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 7:06 am
by Clay J. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 12:41 pm
As suggested here, Wood v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:59 pm
”What:Hearing in Jewel v. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 6:51 am
In Halliburton Energy Svcs. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2004, 12:28 pm
In United States v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 7:00 am
It’s not often that a Texas tax collection case achieves the status of a published decision by one of the State’s appellate courts, but that’s exactly what happened in Noorani Gas & Convenience, Inc., et al., v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 11:14 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 4:11 pm
Yesterday, in United States v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 3:11 pm
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Simonoff v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:51 am
But it was the Supreme Court's 2008 decision in a Kentucky case, Baze v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 2:47 pm
Today, the North Carolina Court of Appeals said that it did not have the authority to adopt the "new" standard for consideration of a Rule 12(b)(6) Motion articulated last year by the United States Supreme Court in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 8:20 am
Last year, in United States v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 3:45 am
Last year, in State v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 5:33 pm
EEOC v. [read post]
