Search for: "Clean Water Action v. EPA" Results 1 - 20 of 517
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2012, 4:53 pm
EPA; Victory for Due Process and a Check on the Clean Water Act By R Tamara de Silva March 21, 2012 Today the United States Supreme Court ruled unanimously in Sackett v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 3:07 pm by Keith Garner and Daniel Maroon
The Clean Water Rule represented the Obama administration’s attempt to clarify and define the scope of waters subject to regulation under the Clean Water Act following the Rapanos v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 3:07 pm by Keith Garner and Daniel Maroon
The Clean Water Rule represented the Obama administration’s attempt to clarify and define the scope of waters subject to regulation under the Clean Water Act following the Rapanos v. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 2:19 pm by James Rusk and Keith Garner
The action essentially would maintain the status quo, since the Sixth Circuit had already enjoined implementation of the Clean Water Rule nationwide pending the outcome of a legal challenge. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 2:12 pm
Many groups and the EPA recognize that given these recent decisions there may be little that can be done to enforce water quality and integrity provisions of these waters.The current situation requires Congressional action. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 12:09 pm by Rachel Gerber
Department of Defense [SCOTUSblog materials] is focused on the question of the Clean Water Act's [EPA backgrounder] judicial review provision. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 2:19 pm by James Rusk and Keith Garner
The action essentially would maintain the status quo, since the Sixth Circuit had already enjoined implementation of the Clean Water Rule nationwide pending the outcome of a legal challenge. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 10:59 am by Chuck Maduell
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 566 U.S. ___(2012) (No. 10-1062, March 21, 2012) (Ginsberg, J. and Alito, J, concurring), held that the Sacketts, owners of a 2/3-acre residential lot near Priest Lake in Idaho, could bring a civil action under the Administrative Procedures Act (APA) challenging an EPA compliance order under Section 309 of the Clean Water Act (CWA). [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 10:04 am by Mark Lebel
On June 28, the Supreme Court granted a petition to review a Ninth Circuit decision holding, as other circuits have also held, that administrative compliance orders issued by the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) under the Clean Water Act are not judicially reviewable until EPA brings an enforcement action in federal court. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 2:52 pm by R. Clark Morrison and Scott Birkey
  The decision was a clear rebuff to EPA, which argued that only direct discharges to surface waters are regulable under the Clean Water Act. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 1:24 pm by Alex Basilevsky
The Clean Water Action Plan actually commits the EPA to the development of numerical nutrient criteria by 2003. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 9:00 am by James M. McClammer
  Read More » Tags: Administrative Appeals, Administrative Procedures Act, Army Corps, Clean Water Act, Eighth Circuit, Enforcement, EPA, Federal Procedure, Informal Agency Action, Permits, Procedure, Rapanos, Supreme Court, Water, Wetlands [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 7:07 pm by Holly Doremus
As Rick notes below, the Supreme Court has just agreed to hear a case arising from enforcement of the wetlands permitting requirements of the Clean Water Act, Sackett v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 7:14 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
EPA, a case with significant implications for the scope of federal jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act (CWA). [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 3:59 pm by Keith Garner and James Rusk
The controversial rule, which redefines which water bodies qualify as “waters of the United States” under the Clean Water Act, was issued by the EPA and U.S. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 7:05 am by Environmental Law Prof
On August 29, the Seventh Circuit (Easterbrook, Sykes, Tinder) issued a decision in Clean Water Action Council of Northeastern Wisconsin v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 1:24 pm by Alex Basilevsky
The plaintiffs' initial legal hook was a 1998 EPA document called the Clean Water Action Plan, 63 Fed. [read post]