Search for: "Clean Wisconsin v. Environmental Protection Agency"
Results 21 - 40
of 53
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2017, 10:06 am
Environmental Protection Agency (Clean Air Act - Federal Implementation Plan) A.D. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am
Wisconsin, 15-214, and Sheriff v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 12:05 pm
See, Hawkes Co., Inc. et al v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:48 am
This required the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) to do a case-by-case analysis to determine whether the water was governed by federal law or by state law. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 2:00 am
District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin in Northern States Power Company v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 6:22 pm
Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and the Army Corps of Engineers (“ACE”), the WOTUS Rule defines (and arguably expands) EPA’s and ACE’s jurisdiction under the federal Clean Water Act (“CWA”). [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 8:59 am
At issue is whether the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) approval of the regulation as part of California's state implementation plan (SIP) divested the district court of subject matter jurisdiction under the Clean Air Act. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 8:22 am
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as unsafe for <> BTLaw Alert: EPA Proposes Rulemaking: Revising the Regulatory Definition of "Waters of the United States" - The 370-page proposal should be published in the Federal Register soon, starting a 90-day comment period <> Supreme Court to Decide Whether CERCLA Statute Can Revive Otherwise Time-Barred Toxic Tort Suit - The Supreme Court will hear oral argument in CTS Corp. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 6:56 am
Menasha Corporation v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
Coal and water: reclaiming the Clean Water Act for environmental protection. 25 Tul. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 1:44 pm
The Environmental Protection Agency's 'Federal Implementation Plans: Interstate Transport of Fine Particulate Matter and Ozone and Correction of SIP Approvals; Final Rule,' 76 Fed. [read post]
12 May 2011, 3:47 pm
Perhaps of broader interest, however, is the substantive question facing the Court, which is whether, in light of the powers vested in the Environmental Protection Agency under the Clean Air Act, a federal common law public nuisance claim is the proper course by which to seek redress for the rise in global temperatures to which the defendants are alleged to be substantial contributors. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:19 pm
The full text of the petition can be found at: Environmental Integrity v. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 4:56 pm
Those grievances multiplied as the U.S. government agency most directly charged with looking after the environment — the Environmental Protection Agency — resisted the pressure to attack “greenhouse gas” emissions. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 7:50 am
Environmental Protection Agency, the 2007 decision in which the Court held that the EPA had the statutory authority to regulate greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:16 pm
(Coeur Alaska, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am
(Piedmont Environmental Council v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 9:41 am
For those who believe the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has acted too slowly in promulgating greenhouse gas regulation, civil actions are now possible at least in the Second Circuit. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 1:24 pm
More than a decade ago the Environmental Protection Agency brought this suit against affiliated owners (i.e. [read post]
