Search for: "Clear v. Patterson"
Results 1 - 20
of 260
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2020, 7:58 am
Jordan v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 1:14 pm
Patterson, an Alabama death penalty case. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 3:21 am
But the CJEU is clear that the parties’ proposals must be a “written offer for a licence on FRAND terms” (Huawei v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 5:58 am
The Court determined that, based upon the clear language of Section 9-106 of the Education Article, the State Board may only grant waivers of provisions applying to all public schools, and not those specific to just public charter schools, and therefore Title 9's provisions were not subject to waiver under Section 9-106(b). [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 3:30 am
As the UnitedStates Supreme Court wrote in Chessman v. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 11:54 pm
" Patterson v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 2:21 pm
By Jeff Patterson, Ph.D. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 2:21 pm
By Jeff Patterson, Ph.D. [read post]
4 May 2015, 11:20 am
Notwithstanding what the Ninth Circuit holds today.I agree with Judge Fletcher that this history isn't crystal clear, and that contrary arguments can be made. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 6:34 am
There was a large number of filings in the USA v. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 3:14 pm
Gunn (1956), 2 D.L.R. (2d) 351, 18 W.W.R. 85 (Sask.C.A.); Patterson v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 2:40 pm
In State v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 10:46 am
But his contempt decision in Patterson v. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 5:01 am
This was a blatant misdirection and clear error of law. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 10:01 am
The case is Patterson v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 4:30 am
Carol Severance v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 4:27 pm
Patterson, No. 07-20409 (Apr. 23, 2009). [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 7:28 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:29 am
The landowner's actions relying on a valid permit must be so substantial that the municipal action results in serious loss rendering the improvements essentially valueless" (Town of Orangetown v Magee, 88 NY2d at 47-48; see Glacial Aggregates LLC v Town of Yorkshire, 14 NY3d at 136; People v Miller, 304 NY at 109; Matter of RC Enters. v Town of Patterson, 42 AD3d at 544; People ex rel. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 9:53 am
Patterson stipulating that “[w]e cannot replace the actual text with speculation as to Congress’ intent. [read post]
