Search for: "Clemente v. United States"
Results 101 - 120
of 457
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2011, 8:45 am
In his motion to dismiss in Pedersen v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
The Court seemed to hold that in 1962, when it ruled in Engel v. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 4:49 am
., United States District Judge for the Western District of North Carolina and Kathy Clements, The Vanishing Criminal Jury Trial: From Trial Judges to Sentencing Judge, 86 GEO. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:29 pm
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 7:55 am
On May 2, 2022, the Supreme Court granted certiorari to Helix Energy Solutions Group Incorporated after Helix lost before the en banc United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in a sharply-divided opinion last year. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 8:34 am
Wednesday’s oral argument in PPL Montana v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
United States. [read post]
30 Jun 2005, 8:20 am
During Oral Argument in United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 8:40 am
Justice Scalia challenged Waxman to name a single precedent in which a non-citizen held outside the sovereign territory of the United States (or England) was entitled to habeas even though no statute so provided. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:56 pm
Sanders, the Court invalidated Georgia’s primary election law and county unit system. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 2:30 pm
The case is officially known as Florida v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 7:46 am
Access Corp. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 11:01 am
There was a substantial amount of discussion over whether Guantanamo Bay fell under the legal jurisdiction of the United States or Cuba. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 6:24 am
United States, which threw] into doubt his 2006 conviction for fraud and conspiracy. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 12:30 pm
In Revolutionary Concepts, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 9:43 am
” States, however, have had different criteria for who can marry since the founding of the United States. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 7:37 am
That a simplified version of the P&I Clause but the point is that it ensures "the citizens of the United States [are] one people, by placing the citizens of each State upon the same footing with citizens of other States," even if people in those other states elect someone that we despise to the White House.The case is Clement v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 2:27 pm
This requirement is consistent with the limitation imposed upon state-taxpayer standing in federal courts in Doremus v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 4:36 am
Last week the District of Columbia Court of Appeals ruled in Clement et al v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 2:29 pm
United States, Don Verrilli, Donald B. [read post]
