Search for: "Clements v. Clements" Results 61 - 80 of 1,192
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2023, 11:38 am by Michael Oykhman
In a case known as R v Clement, the Supreme Court of Canada determined that the orders contemplated by section 127 included all orders made by a court, not merely criminal or quasi-criminal ones (see: R v Clement, 1981 CanLII 212 (SCC), [1981] 2 SCR 468). [read post]
On December 21, 2022, the Michigan Supreme Court held that the Whistleblowers’ Protection Act (“WPA”) protects employees who report that their employer has violated “suspected” laws in a case called Janetsky v. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 4:59 pm by Katherine Pompilio
  Natalie Orpett sat down with Saraphin Dhanani to discuss United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 4:44 pm by Howard Bashman
According to the article, “A petition filed by attorney Paul Clement with the high court Thursday asked the court to take the case and find the rule requiring fishermen to pay for the monitors is inconsistent with the Magnuson-Stevens fishing act or to overturn the Supreme Court’s 1984 Chevron v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 11:35 am by David Kopel
Clement, the winning attorney in Bruen, joined the board of the Bradley Foundation in 2020. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 2:28 pm by Charlotte Garden
ShareOn Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:32 pm by Mark Walsh
And Paul Clement, now of the boutique firm Clement & Murphy, is seated at the second case counsel table to await argument in Helix Energy Solutions Group v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 11:47 am by Michael Oykhman
The case of R v ML, 2021 NBCA 27 also stated that the actus reus is made out where a “reasonable person aware of the circumstances would perceive the words as a threat of death or bodily harm”. [read post]