Search for: "Clements v. Phillips" Results 1 - 20 of 39
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2019, 10:58 am by Adam Feldman
Paul Clement, Neal Katyal, Ginger Anders and Carter Phillips each argued cases with QPs raising issues under five different amendments in total. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 12:28 pm by Adam Feldman
The most frequent oral advocates include David Frederick with nine arguments, Tom Goldstein and Paul Clement with eight, and Neal Katyal, Malcolm Stewart, and Carter Phillips with four each. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 1:51 pm by Adam Feldman
Many of the most notable appellate attorneys now in practice argued several of these cases, with Paul Clement in the lead, followed by fellow veteran Supreme Court attorneys Carter Phillips, David Frederick and Seth Waxman. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:39 pm by Marty Lederman
  As I recounted in that earlier post, when he was Solicitor General, Paul Clement wisely abandoned that argument. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:14 am by Scott Bomboy
The Court granted arguments in Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 8:10 am by Dennis Crouch
To name a few, Ted Olson represented Acorda; Paul Clement represented Mylan; Kannon Shanmugam for AZ; Andy Pincus and Carter Phillips both filed amicus briefs. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 11:13 am by Lyle Denniston
Phillips, who used his ten minutes to good advantage. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 10:53 am by Ronald Mann
  But now the Supreme Court will have a chance to face the question squarely, in Alice Corp. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
A finding of 100% contributory negligence should never be made: see Part III.G.i. [13] Civil Procedure Rules 1998 (UK), SI 1998/3132, r 44.3(2)(a). [14] Onay v Brown [2009] EWCA Civ 775; Sonmez v Kebabery Wholesale Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 1386. [15] Maes Finance Ltd v AL Phillips & Co (1997) The Times, 25 March (Ch D); Lunnun v Singh (1999) The Times, 19 July (CA). [16] See, eg, Pankhurst v White [2006] EWHC 2093 (QB). [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 2:00 pm by Kedar S. Bhatia
Clement will argue his first case of the Term tomorrow (Maracich v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 7:20 am by Kedar Bhatia
Paul Clement leads all advocates in private practice with nine appearances, including appearances in cases such as Perry v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm by INFORRM
Firstly, the IPCC and the Metropolitan Police v The Guardian (clause 1). [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
On Wednesday 1 February 2012, judgment was handed down in the cases of Phillips v NGN and Coogan v NGN, (heard 28 and 29 November 2011). [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
’ 28 February 2012, 1pm, ‘Consent of the Networked: The Worldwide Struggle for Internet Freedom‘ – Rebecca MacKinnon’, at Polis, LSE, Clement House Room 302 (Third Floor), Clement House, 99 Aldwych. 29 February 2012, 9am-2pm. ‘Justice Wide Open‘. [read post]