Search for: "Cleverly v. Cleverly" Results 61 - 80 of 245
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2017, 7:38 am by Andrew Koppelman
  The new school of political economy that he created at the University of Virginia was “meant to train a new generation of thinkers to push back against Brown [v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 7:17 am by Lorene Park
No matter how cleverly a purchase agreement is drafted to avoid the assumption of liabilities, successor companies that have purchased another company may find themselves liable for the predecessor’s labor and employment law violations. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 9:34 pm by Bernie Burk
Every now and then, it’s fun to take a story prominent in the day’s headlines and unearth the Professional Responsibility issues that may quietly be driving the plot. [read post]
9 May 2017, 9:36 am
Yesterday's DJ had a couple appellate articles of note:The Appellate Zealots column by Charles Kagay covered the Cal Supremes' anti-SLAPP opinion in Barry v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:30 am by Josh Blackman
Yesterday, thirteen judges of the Fourth Circuit sitting en banc heard argument in IRAP v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 2:48 pm by Howard Friedman
Today the U.S. 4th Circuit Court of appeals sitting en banc  (13 judges) heard oral arguments (audio of oral arguments from C-Span) in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 6:58 am by Eric Goldman
My new article, cleverly named “The Defend Trade Secrets Act Isn’t an ‘Intellectual Property’ Law,” answers that question in a prolix manner befitting a law professor. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 3:45 pm by Micah Belden
The two conflicting orders, one which commanded him to stay and the other which commanded him to go, were nothing but a cleverly devised trap to accomplish the real purpose of the military authority, which was to lock him up in a concentration camp. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:45 pm by Micah Belden
The two conflicting orders, one which commanded him to stay and the other which commanded him to go, were nothing but a cleverly devised trap to accomplish the real purpose of the military authority, which was to lock him up in a concentration camp. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:45 pm by Micah Belden
The two conflicting orders, one which commanded him to stay and the other which commanded him to go, were nothing but a cleverly devised trap to accomplish the real purpose of the military authority, which was to lock him up in a concentration camp. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 5:49 am
The Third Circuit issued a brief non-precedential decision in Herzfeld v. 1416 Chancellor, Inc. [read post]