Search for: "Click-to-Call Technologies LP"
Results 61 - 80
of 83
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
Click-To-Call Technologies, LP, a patent case also decided on Monday. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 4:05 am
Click-to-Call Technologies, LP, in which the court will decide whether federal patent law allows an appeal of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s decision to institute a procedure for challenging the validity of a patent after a finding that a one-year time bar does not apply, for this blog. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 9:06 pm
Click-To-Call Technologies, LP. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 6:41 am
Petitions Granted with immediate Vacatur and Remand (GVR) Click-to-Call Tech, LP v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 11:03 am
Calls for Papers Call for Papers for the 2017 Lieber Society Richard R. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 9:33 am
Calls for Papers Call for Papers - National Security Law Writing Competition The Judge Advocate General's School (AFJAGS), in partnership with the Air Force JAG School Foundation, Inc., is pleased to announce a call for papers for its second annual National Security Law writing competition. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 12:56 pm
The Scope of Appeals from IPR Proceedings In Click-To-Call Technologies, LP, No. 18-916, the Supreme Court will address whether a patent owner can appeal a decision from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) concerning the timeliness of a petition for inter partes review (“IPR”). [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 6:18 am
Click-To-Call Technologies, LP, et al., No. 18-916 (Is the 315(d) time-bar triggered by prior lawsuits that were dismissed without prejudice?) [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 6:53 pm
LP agreed to the amount in a proposed consent decree filed in Tulsa federal court late Tuesday. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
Click Here Power Provider Settles CAA Issues. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 4:09 am
Click-to-Call Technologies, LP, in which the court held that federal patent law does not allow an appeal of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s decision to institute a procedure for challenging the validity of a patent after a finding that a one-year time bar does not apply, arguing that “[t]he Court’s expansive reading of the prohibition of judicial review is just another decision in which it hands its own power over to the executive branch. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 8:10 am
Lee Partners LP announced that the deal had been funded in escrow. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 8:41 am
Click-To-Call Techs., LP, 140 S. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 3:59 am
Click-to-Call Technologies, LP, another 7-2 opinion, the justices ruled that federal patent law does not allow an appeal of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s decision to institute a procedure for challenging the validity of a patent after a finding that a one-year time bar does not apply. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 8:55 am
For something we were vetting for p&g, and right then like it clicked, the light bulb clicked like, This is it. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 3:25 am
Legal Support (eDiscovery and Computer Forensics Division)Business Intelligence Associates (BIA) 5-Dec-17HAYSTACK ID LLC (Investee)TCF Capital Funding (Support Of Knox Capital Holdings and Maranon Capital) in Recapitalization (Investor)$17.800,000 30-Nov-17E-STETEY 28-Nov-17AllegoryIntegreon 31-Oct-17Avalon Document Services (Merger)C:Dox (Merger) 23-Oct-17NexLP (Investment)Method Capital and Dundee Venture Capital (Investors)$3,000,000 23-Oct-17HAYSTACKID LLC (Investee)Knox Capital (Investor)… [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:07 pm
For a general description of the Act, click this link. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:07 pm
For a general description of the Act, click this link. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:45 am
Click-To-Call Technologies, LP, 18-916 Issues: (1) Whether 35 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:21 pm
Brookfield was the first to present a claim of initial interest confusion on the Internet; we recognized at the time it would not be the last, and so emphasized flexibility over rigidity....Given the multifaceted nature of the Internet and the ever-expanding ways in which we all use the technology, however, it makes no sense to prioritize the same three factors for every type of potential online commercial activity. [read post]
