Search for: "Close v. Dept. of Rev." Results 1 - 20 of 33
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
” The Chapter 51 treatment of “accidental” infectious diseases is closely related to the § 43.05 discussion of COVID-19. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 5:00 am
[Klamm], 205 AD2d 459 [1st Dept 1994]; Broida v Bancroft, 103 AD2d 88 [2d Dept 1984]; Tosi v Pastene & Co., 34 AD2d 520 [1st Dept 1970]). [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 11:10 pm by Josh Blackman
For the latter reason, the applicants argue that the Order is not neutral and generally applicable for purposes of Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 4:47 pm
Sec US Dept Ed    Eastern District of Michigan at DetroitR. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
See, e.g., Matter of Cline v Donovan, 72 AD3d 471, 472-472 (1st Dept 2010) (dissolution should not have been granted due to question of fact as to whether petitioner was member of LLC); Caplash v Rochester Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Assoc., LLC, 63 AD3d 1683 (4th Dept 2009) (plaintiff had standing to dissolve LLC because his resignation as member was not effective before he moved for dissolution). [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm by admin
See, e.g., Kidder, Peabody & Co., Inc. v. [read post]