Search for: "Coades, Appeal of" Results 1 - 20 of 28
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2010, 12:00 am by INFORRM
Jonathan Coad,  Partner in Swan Turton and head of the firm’s Litigation Group. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 2:43 pm by INFORRM
If they are to remain, then the PCC should only be an arbitrator if there is a fully independent system of appeal. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 4:27 am by INFORRM
Jonathan Coad acted for the Respondent, Danny Simpson, he is a partner at Lewis Silkin LLP and acts for both claimants and defendants. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 6:19 am by INFORRM
Jonathan Coad is a partner at Lewis Silkin LLP and acts for claimants and defendants. [read post]
4 May 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Jonathan Coad is a partner in the Media Brands and Technology Group at Lewis Silkin LLP and acts for both Claimants and Defendants. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Because the PCC permitted no appeal against its judgments – as does IPSO – there was no remedy except via the courts. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
So far as I am aware no one has to date pointed out the thumping irony that even though IPSO is chaired by an ex Lord Justice of Appeal it still allows no appeal against its adjudications. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
Jonathan Coad is a partner in the Media Brands and Technology Group at Lewis Silkin LLP and acts for both Claimants and Defendants. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
  We appealed against the strike out application, which gave me a period of nearly a year to work on what was then called the “justification” defence (now called “truth”) and make it good, during which time I worked as much as an investigative reporter as a lawyer. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 4:40 am by INFORRM
Jonathan Coad’s 26 April 2016 Huffington Post piece here neatly sets out the chronology and encapsulates a claimants’ approach to the events involving tabloid journalism. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 4:18 am by INFORRM
  Sir Alan officiates over a quasi-legal regulatory system which forbids any substantive appeal process while praising the work of the Court of Appeal. [read post]
30 May 2016, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal and granted the injunction declaring that there was no public interest in the information being published. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
 The High Court, the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court are on “vacation” over this period and Inforrm is taking a short Easter break. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 6:31 am by INFORRM
In the Court of Appeal Lokhova v Tymula, an application for permission to appeal is listed for 16 May 2017. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
In December 2015, the Court of Appeal dismissed the Mirror Phone Hacking Appeals, approving an approach to privacy damages which produces considerably higher awards. [read post]