Search for: "Coakley v Plante"
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2013, 1:13 pm
California's own supreme court heard arguments on this very issue last month, and a decision is pending in Riverside v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 2:05 am
Coakley Co. [read post]
17 Jul 2021, 3:18 pm
In Taking Offense v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 10:56 am
Coakley (09-592) and postponed it to a later edition of Petitions to Watch, due to the Court's request for a response that is now due February 4. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 10:30 am
Fyock v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
The company also agreed to stock a pond with fish to replace those killed by the spill and spend about $100,000 to plant vegetation to improve water quality in a creek, according to a news release from the Justice Department and the Environmental Protection Agency. [read post]
