Search for: "Coakley v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 170
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am
”Agin v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 4:20 am
The recent foreclosure legislation proposed by Secretary of State Bill Galvin and Attorney General Martha Coakley contains mandates following these ideas. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am
In Girard v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 5:21 pm
Recently, in Souza v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 8:29 am
State v. [read post]
8 May 2010, 3:03 pm
"Amends the Defense of Marriage Act to repeal provisions allowing states, territories, possessions of the United States, or Indian tribes to give no effect... [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 6:29 am
United States: Judge Roger W. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 6:29 am
United States: Judge Roger W. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:13 am
Coakley — constitutionality of state law banning anti-abortion protesters near clinics; alternative question on continuing validity of Hill v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 8:29 am
(Notably, it was Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley who argued – and lost - the case for the state of Massachusetts.) [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 8:29 am
(Notably, it was Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley who argued – and lost - the case for the state of Massachusetts.) [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 11:17 am
Here, though, is what the majority said in Hill v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 7:07 am
Coakley (09-592). [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 10:46 am
In Camara v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 4:09 am
The latest is legislation filed by State Senator Karen Spilka and Attorney General Martha Coakley mandating loan modifications in certain circumstances. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:26 am
Coakley (2014). [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 8:15 am
Department of Health Services et al.Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley has filed a motion for summary judgment in in Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 6:52 am
(Lyle summarized the state of play in those proceedings for this blog.) [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 7:14 am
California and United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 8:54 pm
Weimerskirch v. [read post]
