Search for: "Coates v. Commonwealth" Results 1 - 20 of 28
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2024, 1:44 pm by Kalvis Golde
Andes Petroleum Ecuador Ltd. 23-506Issue: Whether an arbitrator’s failure to disclose a relationship evinces evident partiality if it shows the arbitrator “might reasonably be thought biased,” as Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 5:00 am by Anna Price
Puerto Rico Municipalities Coats of Arm, Photo by FlickruserJimmy Emerson, DVM May 23, 2017. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 8:59 am by Eugene Volokh
I just ran across it for the first time, so I thought I'd pass it along; it's Schoeller v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings: Excessive tax rates on cigarettes in some states induce substantial black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 6:00 am by Lev Sugarman
  Coats and Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency Lt. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 8:28 am by John H Curley
 Relying in part on what it described as the seminal case on the issue of undisclosed background information (Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 4:12 am by David DePaolo
Pennsylvania Coat of ArmsOriginally found compensable by a workers' compensation judge, then reversed by the Appeals Board, the state Commonwealth Court agreed with the original ruling finding compensability.The case is O'Rourke v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:35 am by Ken Lammers
" Virginia's constitution sets up a General Assembly (Article IV), Governor (Article V), Judiciary (Article VI), and Constitutional Officers (Article VII Section 4). [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 11:22 am by Victoria VanBuren
Full discussion and reliance on Justice Black’s and Justice White’s opinion in Commonwealth Coatings v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 7:00 am by Victoria VanBuren
Supreme Court’s evident-partiality decision, Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 10:40 pm by Stephen Page
In his reasons, Cronin J approved reasoning of Coates FM in Murphy v Murphy [2009] FMCAfam 270 where his Honour determined a legal practitioner meant a person entitled to practice in the jurisdiction. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 7:39 am by Beth Graham
” TUCO, 960 S.W.2d at 636 (emphasis original) (citing Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. [read post]