Search for: "Cobb v. Smith"
Results 1 - 20
of 43
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2015, 6:24 am
The case is Robinson v. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 11:28 am
Smith v. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 9:29 am
Easterling, 231 Ga. 90 (200 S.E.2d 267) (1973); Smith v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 1:04 pm
Van Colle (administrator of the estate of GC (deceased)) and another (Original-Respondents and Cross-appellants) v Chief Constable of the Hertfordshire Police (Original Appellant and Cross-respondent) Smith (Respondent) v Chief Constable of Sussex Police (Appellant) [2008] UKHL 50 (30 July 2008) Caldarelli (Appellant) v Court of Naples (Respondent) (Criminal Appeal from her Majesty's High Court of Justice) [2008] UKHL 51 (30 July 2008) R (on the application… [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 9:11 am
Smith v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 4:32 am
Smith, 2010 U.S. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 6:02 am
Cobb v.State of Indiana (NFP) David Dozier v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 7:23 am
The ruling in Adams v. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 1:51 am
The case, Peffer v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 3:39 pm
Remittitur The Supreme Court of Arizona rendered an opinion in Soto v, Sacco on July 13, 2017. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 12:00 pm
Smith, 2010 U.S. [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 11:28 am
In such situations, the prosecutor may be relying on evidence that exists in the case, but characterizes it differently depending on what suits the prosecutor’s theory, even if the arguments made in both cases are mutually inconsistent (see, e.g., Smith v Groose, 205 F3d 1045, 1050 [8th Cir 2000]; Thompson v Calderon, 120 F3d 1045 [9th Cir 1997], rev’d on other grounds 523 US 538; United States v Salerno, 937 F2d 797, 812 [2nd Cir 1991],… [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 8:01 am
Bean J accepts that proposition (at [30], notwithdtanding Lord Scott’s contrary dicta in Cobbe. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am
First credit goes to HHJ Purle QC, sitting as a judge of the High Court, who has managed the seemingly impossible task of giving judgment in such a case without reference to any authority (beyond Yeoman's Row v Cobbe, but on the quantum meruit point), despite the case being redolent (at least) of the facts in Lloyds Bank v Rosset, Midland Bank v Cooke, Coombes v Smith, Cobbe (on the estoppel point), Stack v Dowden, Thorner… [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am
First credit goes to HHJ Purle QC, sitting as a judge of the High Court, who has managed the seemingly impossible task of giving judgment in such a case without reference to any authority (beyond Yeoman's Row v Cobbe, but on the quantum meruit point), despite the case being redolent (at least) of the facts in Lloyds Bank v Rosset, Midland Bank v Cooke, Coombes v Smith, Cobbe (on the estoppel point), Stack v Dowden, Thorner… [read post]
23 May 2008, 6:31 pm
Stephen Schuster of the Superior Court of Cobb County in Marietta, Georgia, and lawyers David Givelber and Nancy Lawler, both of Cohen, Pollock, Merlin & Small in Atlanta, took the audience through the esoteric but increasingly more important topic of challenging expert witnesses under the Daubert rule (named after one of the litigants in the case of Daubert v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 10:58 am
(See Cobb v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 6:02 am
(See Cobb v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 9:00 am
(See Cobb v. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 9:24 am
See Cobb and Eldridge, Georgia Law of Damages, § 37-2, p. 714; see generally City of Macon v. [read post]
