Search for: "Coca v. People" Results 61 - 80 of 210
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2017, 9:47 am by James Kachmar
  “Nope,” said the Ninth Circuit in the recent case of Elliott v. [read post]
18 May 2017, 9:47 am by James Kachmar
  “Nope,” said the Ninth Circuit in the recent case of Elliott v. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 8:12 pm by Kate Howard
Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc. 16-668 Issue: Whether Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 applies only to physical spaces that people can enter. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  More systematic research bears this out in some ways: recognition/recall is better; to the point that consumers shorten Chevrolet to Chevy and Coca-Cola to Coke. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 6:50 am
looks to the implementation of a document, 297 pages long, that is meant to be accessible to the people and that includes a number of aspirational goals. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 2:56 am
Coke defends against opposition to 'ZERO' trade marksEmma Perot explores Coca-Cola's strategy in defending its ZERO trade marks in a recent USPTO case. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm by Florian Mueller
Design patents in the modern era are seldom directed to fashionable carpet designs or classic Coca-Cola bottles; they are often sought, and issued, for relatively mundane design features. [read post]
20 May 2016, 8:40 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Instead, if you have a picture of a Coca-Cola can in your movie and people wonder/think that Coca-Cola sponsored the movie, that’s confusion. [read post]