Search for: "Code-3 Protection " Results 21 - 40 of 13,692
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Anna Maria Stein
Italy strengthens protection of PDOs and PGIs On 23 August 2023, several amendments to the Italian Industrial Property Code (IPC) entered into force. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
  The Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act ... provides broader protection for religious exercise than is available under the First Amendment. [read post]
14 May 2015, 5:37 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Under the Uniform Probate Code, those with property interests in the estate are viewed as “interested persons” (UPC Section 1-201(23)) and may initiate either informal (UPC Section 3-105) or formal proceedings (UPC Section 3- 401); also the agreement of those interested in the estate is binding on the personal representative (UPC Sections 3-912, 3-1101). [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 2:00 am by Damon Duncan
403(b) retirement plans are generally available to employees of educational institutions and certain non-profit organizations as determined by section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 5:57 pm by Benson Varghese
Yet, protective orders are found both in the Family Code as well as in the Code of Criminal Procedure. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 11:35 am by Russell Knight
” 55 ILCS 5/3-9005 (emphasis mine) Likewise, the local police agency will have a municipal code that requires them the investigate and charge offenses. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 10:00 pm by Jim Hassett
  Finally, Level 3, which is also used as a to-do list in any project, breaks the time down further into drafting the protective order, analyzing the response to a protective order motion, preparing a reply, and so on. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 2:27 am by Jani Ihalainen
Code and copyright rarely meet, but in the vein of the above, can code be construed as a copyright protected work, and if so, how much can you copy before you're infringing the rights attached to the code? [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
The decree included a detailed description of the kind of expressive activities that are protected:3. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 2:31 pm by Russell Knight
A violation of any order of protection, whether issued in a civil or criminal proceeding or by a military tribunal, shall be enforced by a criminal court when: (1) The respondent commits the crime of violation of an order of protection pursuant to Section 12-3.4 or 12-30 of the Criminal Code of 1961 or the Criminal Code of 2012, by having knowingly violated: (i) remedies described in paragraphs (1), (2), (3), (14), or (14.5) of subsection (b) of… [read post]
25 Dec 2007, 11:56 pm
(2) IC 29-3 (guardianship and protective proceedings under the probate code) [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 8:14 am by Jerry Salcido
The court considered Lawrence’s three arguments in determining this issue: (1) the district court misinterpreted subsection (1)(f) of section 78B-7-115 of the Utah Code; (2) the commissioner never found that Jennifer subjectively had a reasonable fear of future abuse; and (3) Lawrence challenges the factual basis upon which the protective order was initially granted. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 8:14 am by Jerry Salcido
The court considered Lawrence’s three arguments in determining this issue: (1) the district court misinterpreted subsection (1)(f) of section 78B-7-115 of the Utah Code; (2) the commissioner never found that Jennifer subjectively had a reasonable fear of future abuse; and (3) Lawrence challenges the factual basis upon which the protective order was initially granted. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 8:14 am by Jerry Salcido
The court considered Lawrence’s three arguments in determining this issue: (1) the district court misinterpreted subsection (1)(f) of section 78B-7-115 of the Utah Code; (2) the commissioner never found that Jennifer subjectively had a reasonable fear of future abuse; and (3) Lawrence challenges the factual basis upon which the protective order was initially granted. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 8:14 am by Jerry Salcido
The court considered Lawrence’s three arguments in determining this issue: (1) the district court misinterpreted subsection (1)(f) of section 78B-7-115 of the Utah Code; (2) the commissioner never found that Jennifer subjectively had a reasonable fear of future abuse; and (3) Lawrence challenges the factual basis upon which the protective order was initially granted. [read post]