Search for: "Coffin v. United States"
Results 81 - 100
of 153
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2012, 8:20 am
" Despite several more arguments from Helena Rubinstein and L'Oreal regarding the admissibility of Allergan's evidence of BOTOX's reputation, the General Court dismissed them all and stated: "the size of the market share of BOTOX in the United Kingdom, 74.3% in 2003, like the degree of awareness of the trade mark of 75% among the specialised public accustomed to pharmaceutical treatments against wrinkles, is sufficient to… [read post]
2 May 2012, 4:22 pm
Objects seized in U.S. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 2:31 pm
Apparently putting the nail in the coffin, Justice Scalia turned the discussion to the interests of the United States as creditor – parroting the argument of the Solicitor General that approving the debtor’s plan here would prejudice the United States when it appears as a creditor – because of its general inability to advance funds to bid in a bankruptcy proceeding. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 9:30 am
Egyptian coffin seized inUS v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 8:52 am
It does come down to protection v. exercise. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 4:17 pm
"In the United States, there is no definite requirement for post-market surveillance for defibrillators and heart valves, artificial hearts and so forth," he said. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 4:17 pm
"In the United States, there is no definite requirement for post-market surveillance for defibrillators and heart valves, artificial hearts and so forth," he said. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 7:30 am
As the Supreme Court said in 1895, in Coffin v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
So we can say, “one more nail in the coffin…. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 9:01 pm
In that pleading, government lawyers reiterate that Lewis is charged with purchasing smuggled Egyptian antiquities transported into the United States, smuggling three Egyptian nesting coffins, conspiring to smuggle, and money laundering in support of smuggling.The prosecution argues that "[i]t is 'axiomatic' that a criminal defendant 'may not challenge a facially valid indictment prior to trial for insufficient evidence,'"… [read post]
Review of the Effects of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act on Third Party Participation Applicants
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am
“New” Defense: Prior Commercial Use The United States has not traditionally had an express prior user defense or experimental user defense, but such defenses have effectively always been present. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 4:28 pm
Evidence in US v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 6:56 am
For United States Dept. of Justice, Interested Party: Susan Frances Knight, U.S. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
The objects imported, therefore, are not contraband or unlawful to possess in the United States. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 8:57 pm
Egyptian coffin seized by ICEin the case of US v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 1:20 pm
Kammen invoked Witherspoon v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 9:57 am
Marbury v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 4:22 pm
As the United States Supreme Court said over 100 years ago in Coffin v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 12:30 pm
—The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply to any application for extension of a patent term under section 156 of title 35, United States Code, that is pending on, that is filed after, or as to which a decision regarding the application is subject to judicial review on, the date of the enactment of this Act. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 11:27 am
Circuit in United States v. [read post]
