Search for: "Cohen v. Blank" Results 1 - 20 of 39
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2016, 4:04 pm by Parker Higgins
When Charles Cohen, the Indiana State Police commander, was asked about information that is more accessible to surveillance now than before cell phones, he drew a blank. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Casson, of Blank Rome, LLP, of Manhattan, represented the husband. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:43 am by William Ford
The Supreme Court declared U.S. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 9:00 am by Michael H Cohen
Stem Cells on Steroids Jenna wants to open an integrative medicine, holistic health wellness center and clinic focusing on anti-aging and longevity medicine, functional medicine, nutraceuticals and cosmeceuticals, rejuvenation, hydration therapy, IV treatments, regeneration, and vitality. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 9:00 am by Staff
These extra requirements are: “(v) The entity may not use space, including, but not limited to, operating and recovery room space, located in or owned by any hospital investor, unless such space is leased from the hospital in accordance with a lease that complies with all the standards of the space rental safe harbor set forth in paragraph (b) of this section; nor may it use equipment owned by or services provided by the hospital unless such equipment is leased in accordance with a… [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 2:28 pm by Andrew Hamm
Howard Fischer of Havasu News reviews Harris v. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 9:00 am by Staff
Subsequent to the FDA approval of Epidiolox, The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) issued a Final Order placing “FDA-approved drugs that contain CBD derived from cannabis and no more than 0.1 percent tetrahydrocannabinols” [such as Epidiolox] in Schedule V of the Controlled Substances Act,”  “Schedule V drugs are considered to have the lowest potential for abuse compared to other scheduled drugs and a low potential for psychological or physical… [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
Or Cohen might have sat in on the suppression hearing in State v. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 4:59 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Rule #3: [T]he existence of an oral agreement is generally a question of fact which cannot be summarily determined on a motion to dismiss (see Martin v Cohen, 17 Misc 3d 1116 [A] [Sup Court, Suffolk County 2007]). [read post]