Search for: "Cohen v. Davis"
Results 41 - 60
of 327
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2022, 3:44 am
” “It is well settled that “[a]n attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of the retainer” (Genesis Merchant Partners, L.P. v Gilbride, Tusa, Last & Spellane, LLC, 157 AD3d 479,482 [1st Dept 2018], citingAmbase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardell, 8 NY3d 428 [2007]). [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 8:01 pm
This claim fails because plaintiff’s various successor counsel had ample time and opportunity to make such a motion, and in fact one did (although it was purportedly abandoned) (see Davis v Cohen & Gresser, LLP, 160 AD3d 484, 487 [1st Dept 2018]). [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 2:24 pm
Leder v Spiegel, 9 NY3d 836 [2007]; Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438 [2007]; AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428 [2007]; Davis v Klein, 88 NY2d 1008 [1996]; Carmel v Lunney, 70 NY2d 169 [1987]). [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 9:30 pm
Tessili v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
And in Lawrence v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
In the space below, we analyze an important and interesting decision, Demers v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:28 am
” (Dushkin v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 2:10 am
AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 435-436 [2007]; Orchard Motorcycle Distribs., Inc. v Morrison Cohen Singer & Weinstein, LLP, 49 AD3d 292 [2008]). [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 3:43 am
Moreover, defendant failed to show that "but for" plaintiff's alleged negligence defendant would have obtained a more favorable result in the underlying landlord-tenant proceeding or would have successfully sold his business to a third-p[*2]arty (see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardell, 8 NY3d 428 [2007]; Davis v Klein, 88 NY2d 1008 [1996]). [read post]
Takeaways From the Facebook Threat and Title VII Head Scarf Cases Handed Down by the Court This Week
3 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Elonis v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 5:11 am
; see also Davis v Cohen & Gresser, LLP, 160 AD3d 484, 486 [1st Dept 2018], lv denied 32 NY3d 911 [2018]). [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
No one knows for sure what the Supreme Court is going to do with Hollingsworth v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 6:36 am
This post is based on a Davis Polk client memorandum by Mr. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 4:25 am
Davis and Moore v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 11:12 am
Cohen v. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 12:24 pm
Cohen, 304 F.3d 563, 569-70 (6th Cir. 2002) (quoting United States v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 9:01 pm
Hardwick in Lawrence v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
He says, for example, drawing on the gender-based peremptory case, J.E.B. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 5:31 am
Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 9:15 pm
Davis and Jacob E. [read post]
