Search for: "Cohen v. Davis"
Results 101 - 120
of 327
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
In the space below, I discuss DIRECTV v. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
One of the most contentious cases of the Supreme Court’s term has been Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm
That’s Constitutional Law I/Marbury v. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 8:28 am
Davis v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 4:45 am
This claim fails because plaintiff’s various successor counsel had ample time and opportunity to make such a motion, and in fact one did (although it was purportedly abandoned) (see Davis v Cohen & Gresser, LLP, 160 AD3d 484, 487 [1st Dept 2018]). [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 4:23 am
The first is Packingham v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 5:07 am
Pearson& Shapiro, 43 A.D.3d 1111, 843 N.Y.S.2d 143; Cohen v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm
In Wallace v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:32 am
And so even if there was some malpractice, successor counsel had a chance to address it (Davis v Cohen & Gresser, LLP, 160 AD3d 484, 487, 74 NYS3d 534 [1st Dept 2018] [dismissing a legal malpractice claim where a successor counsel had sufficient time to protect plaintiff’s interests and failed to do so]). [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 4:21 am
The limitations period, however, may be tolled where there is a continuing attorney-client relationship pertaining specifically to the matter in which the attorney committed the alleged malpractice (see Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d 164, 168 [2001 ]), and where there was “a mutual understanding of need for further services in connection with that same subject matter” (Davis v Cohen & Gresser, LLP, 160 AD3d 484, 486 [1st Dept… [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 4:21 am
The limitations period, however, may be tolled where there is a continuing attorney-client relationship pertaining specifically to the matter in which the attorney committed the alleged malpractice (see Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d 164, 168 [2001 ]), and where there was “a mutual understanding of need for further services in connection with that same subject matter” (Davis v Cohen & Gresser, LLP, 160 AD3d 484, 486 [1st Dept… [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
In Salazar v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 7:30 am
” Briefly: In commentary for the National Law Journal, Debra Katz and Michael Filoromo III preview Staub v. [read post]
12 Jun 2006, 4:54 am
Cohen, supra; Schlesinger v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 4:37 am
On Wednesday, the court heard argument in Salman v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
In one case, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
31 May 2010, 6:20 am
The majority instead has decided to dismiss a case over which we have jurisdiction, thereby violating the longstanding rule, dating back to Cohens v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court’s oral argument on Tuesday in Perry v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
And as the Supreme Court made clear 50 years ago in Brandenburg v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm
If we were to view it this way, the law would survive, according to cases like Ward v. [read post]
