Search for: "Cohens v. Virginia" Results 181 - 200 of 241
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2010, 6:04 am by Amanda Rice
At issue in yesterday’s second case, Virginia Office for Protection and Advocacy v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 7:33 am by Adam Chandler
Writing for AOL Politics Daily, Andrew Cohen predicts that the Court is likely to rule in favor of former Attorney General John Ashcroft in Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, explaining that he doesn’t “think the Court would have accepted the review if it wanted to endorse the 9th Circuit’s view and allow former executive branch officials to face trial — even in the stark circumstances presented by al-Kidd and his lawyers. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 8:07 pm by cdw
“ Under errata, there is  Joshua Wayne Andrews v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 4:56 pm by Colin O'Keefe
" SCAM - West Des Moines lawyer Steve Lombardi on his blog, The Iowa Edict Bowoto v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 11:02 am by Eugene Volokh
Now it seems to me that my analysis missed the likely correct answer, which the Court gave in Cohens v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by Dennis Crouch
Burgess, John Bustamante, Kurt Calia, Mary Calkins, Steve Carlson, Virginia Carron, Yar R.Chaikovsky, Connor Civins, Bradley Coburn, David Cohen, Kristin M. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 7:42 pm by James Bickford
  Adam Cohen reaches a similar conclusion in Time. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 8:42 am by Erin Miller
Yesterday forty-eight states – all save Virginia and Maine — filed an amicus brief in next Term’s case Snyder v. [read post]
31 May 2010, 6:20 am by Russell Jackson
  The majority instead has decided to dismiss a case over which we have jurisdiction, thereby violating the longstanding rule, dating back to Cohens v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:37 pm by Adam Thierer
As mentioned here before, PFF has been rolling out a new series of essays examining proposals that would have the government play a greater role in sustaining struggling media enterprises, “saving journalism,” or promoting more “public interest” content. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:30 am by Venkat
Laxton also argued that Virginia law should apply, because Virginia law provided for a different outcome: Laxton argues that a garnishment case from the Supreme Court of Virginia, Network Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 6:02 am by Adam Chandler
Republicans—whether it’s Bush v. [read post]