Search for: "Cohens v. Virginia" Results 181 - 200 of 256
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2011, 7:03 pm
We conclude that this appeal falls within the narrow class of orders immediately appealable under the collateral order doctrine enunciated in Cohen v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 12:49 pm by Mike Scarcella
” Sellers was lead counsel for the female plaintiffs in the landmark gender discrimination class action Wal-Mart v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 7:53 am by Conor McEvily
Monday’s decisions in Brown v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 6:56 am by Nabiha Syed
Virginia – and how it relates to the current debate on gay marriage in Perry v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:05 pm by Pace Law School Library
Public Service Commission of West Virginia, 665 S.E.2d 315, 2008.) 113 W. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 6:05 am by Nabiha Syed
Other coverage of the Court centered upon the Court’s denial of cert. before judgment in Virginia v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 3:26 pm by Colin O'Keefe
- Washington, DC lawyer Scott Knott of The Ferraro Law Firm on their firm's Tax Whistleblower Report Understanding VC Financings - Transaction Costs and Attorney Fees - Seattle lawyer Asher Bearman of DLA Piper on The Venture Alley Little lies employers tell . . . and why they shouldn't - Winston-Salem attorney Robin Shea of Constangy on the firm's blog, Employment & Labor Insider New Energy Grants Help to Expand Alternative Fuel, Clean… [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 6:25 am by Adam Chandler
Yesterday, in Virginia Office for Protection and Advocacy v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 6:06 am by Nabiha Syed
The Court also declined to act on the petition seeking cert. before judgment in Virginia v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 7:46 am by Nabiha Syed
At Time, Adam Cohen takes a look at Federal Communications Commission v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 6:04 am by Amanda Rice
At issue in yesterday’s second case, Virginia Office for Protection and Advocacy v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 7:33 am by Adam Chandler
Writing for AOL Politics Daily, Andrew Cohen predicts that the Court is likely to rule in favor of former Attorney General John Ashcroft in Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, explaining that he doesn’t “think the Court would have accepted the review if it wanted to endorse the 9th Circuit’s view and allow former executive branch officials to face trial — even in the stark circumstances presented by al-Kidd and his lawyers. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 8:07 pm by cdw
“ Under errata, there is  Joshua Wayne Andrews v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 4:56 pm by Colin O'Keefe
" SCAM - West Des Moines lawyer Steve Lombardi on his blog, The Iowa Edict Bowoto v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 11:02 am by Eugene Volokh
Now it seems to me that my analysis missed the likely correct answer, which the Court gave in Cohens v. [read post]