Search for: "Coker v. Georgia"
Results 21 - 40
of 107
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2013, 12:32 pm
A question arose during argument as to which opinion in Coker v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 6:30 am
Georgia, 433 U.S. 584 (1977) and Kennedy v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 1:08 am
However, since Coker v. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 7:23 pm
The plurality opinion in Coker v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 11:06 am
Ryan (Southern Methodist University) Criminal Justice 09: Criminal Law Stories Time: Fri, Jun 8 - 2:30pm - 4:15pm Place: HHV, TBA20 Session Participants: Chair: Donna Coker (University of Miami) The Story of Wanrow: Reasonableness, Gender, and Self-Defense *Donna Coker (University of Miami) Accomplice Liability and the Murderous Judge *Leo Katz (University of Pennsylvania) Robinson v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 7:00 am
Bituminous appealed the decision to the Georgia appellate court. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 7:59 pm
Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972) (per curiam), and Coker v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 5:49 pm
A city is liable for defects in streets regardless of who created the defect: "it will be liable for resulting injuries, 'no matter by what cause the street or sidewalk may have become defective or unsafe. . . .' Coker v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 12:18 am
Georgia and Allied Cases: Protecting the Death Penalty from Abolition Sheri Lynn Johnson, Coker v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 7:01 pm
The military has followed the Supreme Court case of Coker v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 9:41 pm
(See Coker v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 8:52 pm
In Coker v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 12:24 pm
In ruling that death is a cruel and unusual punishment for rape (Coker v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:49 pm
1977 Coker v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 12:30 pm
Coker v. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 10:25 pm
By the time the Supreme Court decided Coker v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 7:13 am
Coker v. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 8:50 pm
Likewise, under Kennedy and Coker v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
Estelle, 455 U.S. 288, 304 (1980); Coker v. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 1:34 pm
Did the [Court of Appeals] err in holding that under Jackson & Coker v. [read post]
