Search for: "Cole v. Associated Construction Co." Results 1 - 20 of 33
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2011, 5:07 am by Dennis Crouch
Guest Post by Professor Paul Cole, Bournemouth University; European Patent Attorney, Lucas & Co, UK. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 12:28 pm by Josh Blackman
In any event, the latest story from Joan Biskupic and Devan Cole includes a few worthwhile revelations about Lawrence v. [read post]
4 Apr 2021, 9:02 pm by Patricia Salkin
 Congregation Rabbinical College of Tartikov, Inc. v Village of Pomona, 2021 WL 1222159 SDNY 3/31/2021) [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 1:00 pm by Mark Murakami
Matteoni, Matteoni O’Laughlin & Hechtman, San Jose, California, Edward V. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 7:20 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Third, this form of discrimination punishes someone for their same-sex associations. [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm by Law Lady
OF FLORIDA, ANDREA LEVINE and STUART KRAMER, Appellees. 4th District.Contracts -- Action against condominium association for electrical work performed on association's building after plaintiff had obtained judgment for payment against developer -- Error to enter summary judgment for defendant association on basis of affirmative defense that property was under the control of developer and that there was never a contract between plaintiff and association --… [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm by Marty Lederman
”  David Cole worries, however, that perhaps section 1021 will be seen as authorizing detention of individuals–particularly those determined to have “substantially supported” al Qaeda, the Taliban, or their co-belligerent forces–in circumstances inconsistent with longstanding law-of-war principles. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am by Marie Louise
Becton Dickinson (Ladas & Parry) (Patently-O) (Patent Law Practice Center) (WHDA) (Inventive Step) (Patent Docs) (IP Whiteboard) BPAI invalidates Ablaise patent…again: Dow Jones & Co., Inc. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Becton Dickinson (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D New York: Federal police power trumps patent law: IRIS Corporation v Japan Airlines (IP Frontline) Delaware Court: Honeywell patents on LCDs nixed: court dismisses claim of patent infringement: Honeywell v Fujifilm and Samsung (Managing IP) District Court W D of Wisconsin denies motion claim for claim construction in full: Semiconductor Energy Lab Co v Samsung Elecs. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Becton Dickinson (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D New York: Federal police power trumps patent law: IRIS Corporation v Japan Airlines (IP Frontline) Delaware Court: Honeywell patents on LCDs nixed: court dismisses claim of patent infringement: Honeywell v Fujifilm and Samsung (Managing IP) District Court W D of Wisconsin denies motion claim for claim construction in full: Semiconductor Energy Lab Co v Samsung Elecs. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Becton Dickinson (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D New York: Federal police power trumps patent law: IRIS Corporation v Japan Airlines (IP Frontline) Delaware Court: Honeywell patents on LCDs nixed: court dismisses claim of patent infringement: Honeywell v Fujifilm and Samsung (Managing IP) District Court W D of Wisconsin denies motion claim for claim construction in full: Semiconductor Energy Lab Co v Samsung Elecs. [read post]