Search for: "Coleman v. Department of Corrections" Results 1 - 20 of 57
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2011, 3:07 am
”When Coleman initially applied for reinstatement she was evaluated to determine is she was fit to perform the essential duties of a correction officer.Ultimately, the New York State Department of Correctional Services disqualified Delores Coleman for employment as a correction officer based on the Department’s medical expert opinion that Coleman was not psychologically qualified for the position. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 12:09 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
In the present case, Deputy Tatro detained Coleman for the sole purpose of providing a parole officer with enough time to arrive and conduct a search under the Kansas Department of Corrections' rules. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 8:06 am by Robin Shea
Department of Labor, by a group of 21 states, and the other, Chamber of Commerce of Plano v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 7:28 am by Erin Miller
Alabama Department of Revenue (09-520), limited to the question as posed by the Solicitor General in the United States’ amicus brief Cullen v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 3:57 pm by Courtney Minick
Coleman, the Court upheld an injunction allowing the Department of Correction to restrain and force-feed Defendant to prevent life-threatening dehydration and malnutrition. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 3:57 pm by Courtney Minick
Coleman, the Court upheld an injunction allowing the Department of Correction to restrain and force-feed Defendant to prevent life-threatening dehydration and malnutrition. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 2:13 pm by Howard Friedman
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, 2013 U.S. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 11:43 am by Howard Friedman
Washington Department of Corrections, 2013 U.S. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am by John Elwood
Arizona Department of Corrections director Charles Ryan may have lost his recurring role with the expected dismissal of Ryan v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 9:51 am by Kent Scheidegger
The procedural default rules in effect at that time, including Coleman v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:55 am
"Findlaw summaries [may] include opoinions that have not yet been released for publication and may be subject to modification, correction or withdrawl U.S. [read post]