Search for: "Coles v. Coles"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,916
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Cole, further explained that "[t]he apparent purpose [of the bill] is to limit the probationary period . . . for a teacher appointed in a city who has already been serving in that city as a substitute teacher for a period of two years. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Cole, further explained that "[t]he apparent purpose [of the bill] is to limit the probationary period . . . for a teacher appointed in a city who has already been serving in that city as a substitute teacher for a period of two years. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm
Justin Hendrix, Justin Cole, Margaret Shields and Nicholas Tonckens, Timeline: Rep. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 3:44 pm
The post Case Review – On Point Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 10:44 am
’” In a solo dissent, Thomas criticized what he characterized as the majority’s “surprising and misplaced reliance on New York Times v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 12:28 pm
In any event, the latest story from Joan Biskupic and Devan Cole includes a few worthwhile revelations about Lawrence v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:53 pm
” Devan Cole of CNN reports that “Senate confirms lawyer who represented Mississippi abortion clinic at Supreme Court in Dobbs case for federal judgeship. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 10:32 am
Romania and Al Nashiri v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
Part of Just Security’s work on accountability and election law. [read post]
17 May 2023, 5:01 am
Cole. [read post]
10 May 2023, 8:21 am
To support its finding, the Appellate Division pointed to the factors set forth in Cole v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 8:21 am
To support its finding, the Appellate Division pointed to the factors set forth in Cole v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 8:21 am
To support its finding, the Appellate Division pointed to the factors set forth in Cole v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm
It is a common refrain, mostly on the political right, that considering environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) factors when investing is probably illegal.[1] The basis for this argument derives from the fiduciary duty of loyalty and its corollary, the “sole interest” or “exclusive benefit” rule, enshrined in both federal and state law, which prohibits fiduciaries from investing for any purpose other than the financial well-being of the beneficiary. [read post]
3 May 2023, 1:45 pm
Clinton v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 7:22 am
Jones case”: Devan Cole of CNN has this report. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 11:30 am
Times Co. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 7:12 pm
Nearly a decade ago, the court granted review in Elonis v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 7:27 pm
Sys., Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 2:00 pm
Supreme Court has posted online the transcript and audio of today’s oral argument in Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
