Search for: "Colle v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 296
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2021, 5:40 am by Sean Wajert
Manhattan Coll., 20 Civ. 3229 (XLS), 2021 WL 1840864, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
DiBella, [Not be published in the Official Reports.]The general view of the Freedom of Information Law is that "The Legislature enacted FOIL to provide the public with a means of access to governmental records in order to encourage public awareness and understanding of and participation in government and to discourage official secrecy" (Matter of Alderson v New York State Coll. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
The Charter does not directly apply here as no state action is being challenged, although the Charter may inform the development of the common law. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am by INFORRM
Nevertheless, the newspaper repeated the defamation: in an article alongside a photograph of Watters the newspaper had stated: We may have to apologise to this revolting pervert but will we mean it? [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm by John Elwood
Louisiana, 14-280 (third relist since the Court received the state’s brief in opposition); Tolliver v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:24 pm by Pierre T. Nguyen
., United States Patent and Trademark Office). [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 11:25 pm
"This is a sign that they are recognizing Acer's threat, but it should not affect Acer's financials," said Kwock.IPBiz notes that neither article mentioned the Coalition for Patent Fairness.Separately -->In talking about the need to play "legal hardball," a Canadian article talking about a merger between Tri-Vison and Wi-LAN noted:The V-chip, invented by Tri-Vision chairman Tim Collings, is the only solution to the parental controls mandated by… [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 6:52 am
State Law Enforcement Officers Union AFSCME AFL-CIO v City of Albany Applicant failing to meet deadline for teaching certificate must meet new standard - Bhatt v New York State Educ. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 2:37 pm by Eugene Volokh
However, if the State were to adopt Model Rule 8.4(g), its provisions raise serious concerns about the constitutionality of the restrictions it would place on members of the State Bar and the resulting harm to the clients they represent. [read post]