Search for: "Collector v. Richards" Results 1 - 20 of 82
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2024, 7:26 am by centerforartlaw
Prince, a prior copyright infringement case against both Richard Prince and Gagosian, the Gallery continued to represent the controversial artist and is continuing to do so now with the next solo show scheduled to start on March 9.[38] Prince is still a darling of the blue chip collectors and his works sell for record prices at auction. [read post]
Consumer rights attorneys will find this reaffirmation and clarification of debt collector's strict liability under FDCPA very useful in protecting harassed debtors from both unscrupulous and sloppy debt collectors. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 7:39 am by James Hamilton
A cnformation vote is viewed as critical to implementing this Title V of the Dodd-Frank Act so that it fully protects consumers from hidden fees and abusive practices. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:12 pm by centerforartlaw
The Art Institute of Chicago,[1] brought by the heirs of Fritz Grünbaum, a prominent Jewish cabaret performer and art collector. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 3:45 pm by Kaufman Dolowich Voluck
On May 25, 2021, Richard Perr, Monica Littman, and Graeme Hogan of the Philadelphia office of Kaufman Dolowich & Voluck authored a Petition for Rehearing en banc in the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals on behalf of Defendant Preferred Collection & Management Services, as well as the hundreds of entities in the Accounts Receivable Management (“ARM”) industry in the matter captioned Hunstein v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 1:56 pm by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento
Fishko, a case brought by Richard F. [read post]
9 Dec 2006, 7:35 am
Just last month (November 2006), the 600 pound gorilla of debt collection, Muller Muller Richard Harms Myers and Sgroi, P.C., lost an important round in an FDCPA action entitled Stolicker v Muller Muller. [read post]
9 Dec 2006, 7:35 am
Just last month (November 2006), the 600 pound gorilla of debt collection, Muller Muller Richard Harms Myers and Sgroi, P.C., lost an important round in an FDCPA action entitled Stolicker v Muller Muller. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
Richard Re has this blog’s analysis of yesterday’s argument in Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]