Search for: "Collins v. Clausings" Results 81 - 100 of 349
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2013, 5:44 am by Dan Stein
Also at this blog, Ronald Collins studies the record of the Roberts Court on First Amendment rulings and looks forward to upcoming free expression cases next Term. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 1:27 pm by Stephen Bilkis
" The United States Supreme Court has defined an ex post facto law as one which "punishes as a crime an act previously committed, which was innocent when done, which makes more burdensome the punishment for a crime, after its commission, or which deprives one charged with sex crimes of any defense available according to law at the time when the act was committed as held in Collins v Youngblood and Beazell v Ohio. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 2:12 pm by NL
Our thanks to Legal Action ‘Recent Developments in Housing Law’ January 2013 for bringing it to our attention.Affinity Sutton Homes Ltd v Cooper. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 2:12 pm by NL
Our thanks to Legal Action ‘Recent Developments in Housing Law’ January 2013 for bringing it to our attention.Affinity Sutton Homes Ltd v Cooper. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 11:25 pm by Tessa Shepperson
Regular readers of this blog may remember my report on the case of Johnson v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 9:51 am by Ronald Collins
The following is an excerpt from a forthcoming ebook titled When Money Speaks: The McCutcheon Decision, Campaign Finance Laws & The First Amendment (Top Five Books) by Ronald Collins and David Skover. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 10:29 am
For those of you with access to online libraries, the decision is also at Collins v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 10:07 am by R.J. MacReady
There they found Collins and Langham (who is a black female) together in the main bedroom of the house. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 11:17 am by Lisa A. Mazzie
My first thought, upon reading the opinion, was to wonder why the Court did not base its holding more on the Equal Protection Clause, like Judge Richard Posner did in his opinion in Baskin v. [read post]