Search for: "Collins v. Commissioner" Results 61 - 80 of 202
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jul 2016, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
He pointed out that Hogan J in the High Court in Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner [2014] IEHC 310 (18 June 2014), making the reference to the CJEU, considered that the constitutional right to privacy was also directly engaged ([20], [43], [47]-[56], [77]-[79]). [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 1:24 am by Jani
The case of Harvard College v Canada (Commissioner of Patents), the Canadian Supreme Court saw that, even though section 2 is very broad in its wording, it does not include "....anything under the sun that is made by man", and can be therefore limited in its scope. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On Tuesday 31 January 2023 Collins Rice J heard an application in the case of Nagi v Sinniah Santhiramoulsan. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
  On the same day there was a hearing in the  privacy case of GUH v KYT before Collins Rice J. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am by INFORRM
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) is rebuffing calls by members of Parliament to investigate a Chinese genetic research company. [read post]
2 May 2021, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
Surveillance On 27 April the Biometrics and Surveillance Camera Commissioner published a FOI response. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
WHITTLE, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS CAPACITY AS COUNTY COMMISSIONER, RUFUS WARD, JR., ELMER CATON, JOSEF HAUSLER, IN THEIR CAPACITIES AS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, AND THE COUNTY OF RED RIVER; from Red River County; 6th district (06-07-00058-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 03-18-08)08-0350STEPHANIE DUKES, ET AL. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
“The proposals for “Reform of the Information Commissioner’s Office” comprise a power grab to influence (or determine) what the Commissioner’s duties and priorities should be. [read post]
28 Nov 2021, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
The Panopticon Blog has an article on how the recent decision in Killock & Veale & others v Information Commissioner has brought clarity to judicial interpretations of s.166 Data Protection Act 2018 (right to apply to the Tribunal for an order that the ICO progress a complaint made to it). [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
The fact that views can differ significantly is illustrated by another police case, Wood v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2010] 1 WLR 123 CA. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 2:12 am by INFORRM
” DLA Piper has an article on the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) recommendations on lawful methods of using personal information and artificial intelligence. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 8:12 am by Ronald Collins
Morgenthau; for four years he served as the deputy or first deputy commissioner in the Department of Investigation in the administration of Mayor John V. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
On 20-24 June 2022, the trial in the case of Robert Lee v Vanessa Brown was heard before Collins Rice J. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
On 6 April 2022, judgment on meaning was handed down by Collins Rice J in Sivananthan v Vasikaran [2022] EWHC 837 (QB). [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 1:39 am by Matrix Law
Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Professional Game Match Officials Ltd, heard 26th June 2023. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 6:40 pm by Michael Douglas
Available at Westlaw Australia. [5] Alex Mills, Party Autonomy in Private International Law (CUP, 2018) 53, citing Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Co v Shand (1865) 16 ER 103. [6] Alex Mills, The Confluence of Public and Private International Law (CUP, 2009), 53. [7] Antony Gibbs & Sons v Société Industrielle et Commerciale des Métaux (1890) 25 QBD 399, 405 (Gibbs). [8] Alex Mills, Party Autonomy in Private International Law (CUP, 2018) 56, Lord… [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
Damian Collins MP has explained why the Online Safety Bill can rebalance the relationship between Big Tech and journalism to the Press Gazette. [read post]