Search for: "Collins v. Differ" Results 401 - 420 of 886
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2016, 5:17 am by ASAD KHAN
So failing to pay the fee renders an application invalid from the outset but the analysis regarding the provision of biometrics was markedly different. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 3:20 pm by Giles Peaker
The FTT went on to say: The House of Lords Uratemp v Collins [sic] (albeit in a context of different legislation) held that the usage of a room defines what it is and that this depended on the facts at the time the decision was made. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 3:20 pm by Giles Peaker
The FTT went on to say: The House of Lords Uratemp v Collins [sic] (albeit in a context of different legislation) held that the usage of a room defines what it is and that this depended on the facts at the time the decision was made. [read post]
23 May 2023, 6:01 am by Josh Blackman
After oral arguments concluded, the students had lunch with Andrew Tutt, who had just argued Dupree v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am by INFORRM
However, the Court was not persuaded that these questions were compelling reasons to litigate where their answer would make no material difference to the outcome of the case itself. [read post]
28 May 2014, 11:20 am by Steven Boutwell
By Tokesha Collins and Lee Vail On May 15, 2014, the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) announced that it intended to publish a proposed rule to amend the national emission standards governing petroleum refineries. [1]  The emission standards impacted by this proposed rulemaking are: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (“NESHAP”) from Petroleum Refineries (40 CFR part 63, subpart CC) (Refinery MACT 1); National Emission Standards for… [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
McCallum considered the decision of the Victorian Court of Appeal in Herald and Weekly Times v Popovic and the Victorian Supreme Court in Belbin v Lower Murray Urban and Rural Water Corporation. [read post]