Search for: "Collins v. Jones" Results 1 - 20 of 223
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2022, 7:45 am by Eugene Volokh
The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression reports (for more, read Judge Amos Mazzant's August 25 decision denying the college's motion to summary judgment, Jones v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 6:38 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Writ of actual innocence — New science on shaken baby syndrome In 1999, after a bench trial in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County, appellant Clarence Jones was convicted of second-degree murder and child abuse of his infant son, Collin Jones, based on a diagnosis of Shaken Baby Syndrome (“SBS”). [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:51 am
The Supreme Court has allowed the appeal in Jones v Kernott, restoring the order of the county court (i.e. that Ms Jones was entitled to a 90% share of the property). [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 8:02 am by Clare Montgomery QC, Matrix
Although Jones v Kaney will be remembered as the case that abolished the immunity from suit of expert witnesses (at least in respect of claims brought by a litigant to whom the expert owed a duty), it is notable that this was not the only policy issue on which the divided (5-2) Supreme Court clashed. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 2:08 am
High Court (Chancery Division) Bluebrook Ltd, Re [2009] EWHC 2114 (Ch) (11 August 2009) Wall v Collins & Jennifer Collins [2009] EWHC 2100 (Ch) (11 August 2009) High Court (Family Division) GC v LD & Ors [2009] EWHC 1942 (Fam) (24 July 2009) High Court (Technology and Constructions Court) Camillin Denny Architects Ltd v Adelaide Jones & Co Ltd [...] [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 7:51 am by Stephanie Smith, Arden Chambers.
  In 1985, Ms Jones and Mr Kernott bought 39 Badger Hall Avenue. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 5:15 am by Jonathan Spencer
Jones v Collins Motor Sales, Wayne County Circuit Court Case No. 19-010154-NO, Judge Edward Joseph In this premises liability case, Plaintiff claimed Defendant, Collins Motor Sales, negligently maintained a garage door, which allegedly had to be held in its open position by a 2×4. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 5:14 am by INFORRM
  As is well known, First Amendment protection extends to expressive conduct such as flag burning (see, eg, United States v Eichman 496 US 310 (1990)) and to conduct which is grossly offensive – such as demonstrators in Nazi uniforms marching through a Jewish community (Smith v Collin 439 U.S. 916 (1978)). [read post]
4 May 2009, 11:27 am
In his report Jones states the following: "P-1 [Chris] stated he was driving V-1 westbound on Greenback approaching Sunrise Blvd., in the #1 or #2 lane at 50 mph. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 3:29 am by Blog Editorial
On Tuesday 29 and Wednesday 30 March 2011, Lords Phillips, Walker, Mance, Collins and Clarke will hear NML Capital Ltd v Republic of Argentina. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 4:42 pm by INFORRM
This country’s landmark contribution to the international jurisprudence, almost a generation ago now, in Dow Jones & Co Inc v Gutnick, was dismissed by a technologically savvy English judge in 2005 as having treated communications via the internet as if they were “seaside postcards sent by conventional means”. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 9:00 am
This post concludes and summarizes our coverage of the case United States v. [read post]