Search for: "Colorado v. King" Results 81 - 100 of 182
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2016, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Matthew, University of Colorado Law SchoolCourtney Anderson, Georgia State University College of Law Medha D. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 7:18 am by Howard Friedman
King County Department of Adult & Juvenile Detention, 2016 U.S. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 4:28 am by Edith Roberts
Andrew King weighs in on the case at Mimesis Law. [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
On 30 June and 1 July 2016 there was an application in the case of David v Hosany. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 10:02 am by John Elwood
King County, 15-584, but petitioners got the consolation prize of Thomas penning a dissent from denial, joined by Alito. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
On 1 March 2016, Sharp and Hamblen LJJ heard a renewed application for permission to appeal in the case of Sloutsker v Romanova. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
The Chronic Failure to Control Prisoner Isolation in US and Canadian Law Lisa Kerr, Assistant Professor, Queen’s University Faculty of Law(2015) Queen’s Law Journal, Vol. 40, No. 2, 482-530 Excerpt: Introduction, Sections II & V[Footnotes omitted. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 5:44 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
If, under the Supreme Court decision in King, tax credits were not allowed to be extended to coverage purchased under the federal exchanges, then more individuals would have fallen outside of the net of affordable coverage: that’s clear from these numbers. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 1:30 pm
Kathryn Rubio (Above The Law) spotted this item in a Utah Supreme Court case from last week, Barneck v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:23 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  He’s offcenter because he’s been set aside by the king. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:45 am by Amy Howe
At Discourse, the UCLA Law Review’s online publication, Senator Orrin Hatch weighs in on the ACA subsidies case, King v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 3:32 am by Amy Howe
  He concludes that, “[b]ecause the usual statutory meaning also comports with the overall structure of the statute and its purpose and intent, King v. [read post]