Search for: "Colorado v. New Mexico"
Results 201 - 220
of 488
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2018, 5:08 pm
For example, in February 2017, the New York Appellate Division, First Department, applying New York law, reversed a lower court’s rejection of the disclosure-only settlement of a suit that had been filed in connection with Verizon’s proposed acquisition of Vodafone subsidiaries holding ownership interests in Verizon Wireless, as discussed here. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 11:33 am
A date with the Supreme Court: Florida v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 9:03 am
… The case of Nebraska v. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 3:08 pm
Here’s what Commissioner Jairim said, with reference to a concurring opinion in the New Mexico Supreme Court’s Elane Photography decision:I believe . . . it was best said by the judges in the New Mexico case, where the laws are here just to protect individuals from humiliation and dignitary harm. . . . [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 6:35 am
The Supreme Court’s 1992 Quill Corp. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 12:14 pm
In 2014, the Supreme Court turned down a request by a photography studio to review a New Mexico Supreme Court decision holding that the studio violated the state’s anti-discrimination laws when it refused to photograph a same-sex commitment ceremony. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm
Earlier, in 2013, the New Mexico Supreme Court held that a wedding photography company’s refusal to photograph a same-sex couple’s commitment ceremony constituted discrimination based on sexual orientation in violation of that state’s law (Elane Photography, LLC v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 10:10 am
New York is followed by Arizona (44.8 percent of consumption smuggled), Washington (43.7 percent), New Mexico (41.4 percent), and Minnesota (35.9 percent). [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 6:22 am
For that reason, we filed a Supreme Court brief in 2013 arguing that a New Mexico photographer could not be compelled under the Free-Speech Clause to photograph a lesbian couple’s commitment ceremony. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm
One need only look as far as Colorado to see the benefits of access to free contraceptives. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 5:20 am
Background In Noffsinger v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 5:20 am
Background In Noffsinger v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 7:25 am
Willock, in which the Supreme Court declined to review a ruling by the New Mexico Supreme Court that a photography studio violated the state’s anti-discrimination laws when it refused to photograph a same-sex commitment ceremony. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 12:50 pm
Marlow v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 8:59 am
In 2014, the Supreme Court turned down a request by a photography studio to review a New Mexico Supreme Court decision holding that the studio violated the state’s anti-discrimination laws when it refused to photograph a same-sex commitment ceremony. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 10:50 am
Sara MyersThis morning, the New York Court of Appeals released an 81-page opinion in Myers v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 5:07 am
Last week’s decision in Ed H. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 7:39 am
Colorado River Indian Tribes (Indian Child Welfare Act) U.S. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 3:03 pm
Colorado River Indian Tribes (Indian Child Welfare Act)U.S. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 3:03 pm
Colorado River Indian Tribes (Indian Child Welfare Act)U.S. [read post]
