Search for: "Com. v. Baker, T."
Results 1 - 20
of 45
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2011, 3:43 am
In State v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 3:46 am
Her argument was simple: because the sentencing entry in 1991 wasn’t Baker-compliant, it wasn’t a final order. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 3:46 am
Baker, there were separate journal entries for the conviction and the sentence, and Baker says they have to be one document. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:37 pm
From the Religion Clause blog (via my co-author Tom Baker) coms news of Nieto v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 3:33 am
Two weeks ago, in State v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 3:47 am
If you’re the defense attorney and you’ve got an allied offense issue, don’t rely on Baker to absolve you of any responsibilities; you don’t know if the next court’s going to apply Lindsey and knock an appeal out of the box because you didn’t present anything. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 4:18 pm
Baker (1818) 16 U.S. 541, 545); quite recently, it determined that a fish is not a “tangible object” (United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 3:42 am
Baker, which held that a sentencing entry which didn’t include certain terms wasn’t a final appealable order. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 2:39 am
 This week, it's a baker's dozen, plus one. [read post]
5 May 2013, 3:41 pm
Baker J on the rare cases that must go outside of 26 weeks here in Devon CC v EB & Ors [2013] EWHC 968 (Fam). [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 3:49 am
Baker’s situation isn’t novel. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 3:42 am
Ice overruled State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 3:38 am
Take State v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 3:44 am
”) On further review, I’m not so sure; the facts here aren’t much different than those in Terry v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
El texto es largo (son más de 70 páginas) y puede ser algo farragoso o técnico sobre todo al principio. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 3:33 am
And last week in Harris v. [read post]