Search for: "Com. v. Blake, T."
Results 1 - 20
of 41
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2010, 4:06 am
New Jersey and Blakely v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 3:39 am
Three years later, in Oregon v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 3:31 am
New Jersey and Blakely v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 3:34 am
New Jersey and Blakely v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 4:24 am
Google and Amazon (A9.com)(9th Cir. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 3:29 am
In Blakely v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 3:45 am
Back in 2006, in State v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 3:45 am
New Jersey and Blakely v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 4:53 am
The 8th District affirms, finding that since the first sentence wasn’t ever finalized, it didn’t count… In State v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 3:49 am
In fact, you could even make the argument that this isn’t a Blakely issue. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 3:35 am
The first is a Blakely v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 11:36 am
., Com. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 3:42 am
This wasn’t a Blakely issue; that case doesn’t even get mentioned until the concurring opinion, and really was a question of construction of a Federal statute. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 3:43 am
But Blakely and Crawford have revolutionized 6th Amendment jurisprudence, and I haven’t seen anything nearly as pernicious out of the Roberts Court as the 1996 decision in Whren v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 3:43 am
Back in 1983, in US v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 4:29 am
Martin’s argument is that under Blakely v. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 3:47 am
Ice - In a decision that could have major implications for Ohio sentencing law, Court holds that Blakely does not prohibit judicial fact-finding for imposition of consecutive sentences. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 5:01 am
(The other is the Apprendi/Blakely/Booker line of cases regarding the scope of the right to jury trial.) [read post]
