Search for: "Com. v. Cooper, S." Results 81 - 100 of 161
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2022, 8:42 am by Russell Knight
Burris, 273 NE 2d 605 – Ill: Supreme Court 1971 Failure to cooperate on cross-examination means the testimony elicited on direct-examination may be struck. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:24 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City of Santa Clara (2011) 194 Cal.App.4th 1150 [City’s and RDA’s approval of detailed term sheet for 49ers stadium project was not project approval]; City of Santee v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 11:47 am by Bona Law PC
When interpreting that statutory language, lower courts have followed the US Supreme Court’s lead in FTC v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 8:08 am by (admin)
Sobre o sofrimento dos pais de Martin, Obama disse: ”Acho que eles têm o direito de esperar que tudo isso se resolva e com a seriedade que merece e nós vamos chegar ao fundo dos acontecimentos. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 3:13 pm by Marta Requejo
Art. 20 is also said to closely follow art. 12 of Regulation (EC) no 1347/00: in fact, that’s the only useful information provided about the article in the Explanatory Report of the Proposal submitted in 2002 by the Commission [COM (2002) 222 final / 2 of 17 May 2002]. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 12:47 pm by Rick
One of the earliest examples — demonstrating that even the courts would only grudgingly support the will of the voters — came in the case of People v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 1:43 am by Stephen Pitel
  There is considerable American law on this issue, including the much-discussed decision in Zippo Manufacturing v Zippo Dot Com Inc., 952 F Supp 119 (WD Pa 1997). [read post]