Search for: "Com. v. Davis, D."
Results 1 - 20
of 81
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2018, 1:02 pm
Com. on Judiciary, Analysis of Assem. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 2:45 am
No gun was found, no forensic evidence linked Davis to the shooting, and within a few years seven of the nine witnesses against him had recanted, claiming that they’d been coerced into making false statements by the police; several stated that the real shooter had been the man who’d originally fingered Davis to the police. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 3:37 am
The court backpedaled from that a bit last year in Holland v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:04 am
On 19 October 2011, the Supreme Court (Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Wilson) released its decision in the joined cases of R (Davies & Anor) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs and R (Gaines-Cooper) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2011] UKSC 47. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:04 am
On 19 October 2011, the Supreme Court (Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Wilson) released its decision in the joined cases of R (Davies & Anor) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs and R (Gaines-Cooper) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2011] UKSC 47. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 8:00 am
Davis v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 3:41 am
Natapoff also has an excellent, and timely, post about the Troy Davis case, which I talked about yesterday: seems one of the recanting witnesses against Davis was a jailhouse informant who testified that Davis had confessed the crime to him. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 4:26 am
The key case here is the Supreme Court’s 2006 decision in the companion cases of Davis v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 5:17 am
The basis for that conclusion was Davis v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 5:09 am
” While Crawford and Davis were decided unanimously, Giles v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:49 am
Crawford was unanimous (although two justices concurred only in judgment), and the next decision in that line, Davis v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 7:18 am
” from Fladgate LLP (England) NEW CYBER RULES FOR NEW YORK-BASED BANKING, INSURANCE AND FINANCIAL SERVICE FIRMS HAVE FAR-REACHING EFFECTS from Davis Malm & D’Agostine (US) Alitalia (update 4): 32 non-binding expressions of interest have been submitted following the Call of May 17, 2017 from EXPLegal (Italy) Arbitrator Cannot Lift The Corporate Veil – Delhi High Court from LexCounsel (India) Public-Private Joint Ventures in Ecuador… [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 3:44 am
Sotomayor bought into it, and if she’d been writing the majority opinion, we’d have a good bit more to talk about here. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 3:45 am
Washington and Davis v. [read post]
