Search for: "Com. v. Haire, A."
Results 1 - 20
of 46
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2022, 5:00 pm
District Court for the Northern District of Ohio.Source: https://www.law360.com/articles/1519324/sugar-refiner-hit-with-suit-over-safety-gear-prep (subscription required) [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 6:03 am
COM, supra. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 1:45 am
Ltd v ZTE Corp., ZTE Deutschland GmbH | CJEU on disclosure of infringers’ bank data in Coty Germany GmbH v Stadtsparkasse Magdeburg | Infocit - Prestação de Serviços, Comércio Geral e Indústria, Lda v OHIM | Moral ambiguity of trade secrets | CJEU on limits of TM exclusive right in TOP Logistics BV, Van Caem International BV v Bacardi & Company Ltd, Bacardi International Ltd |… [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 3:41 am
Hair comparison analysis resulted in the conviction of any number of innocent people before it was shown to be junk science. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 3:45 am
Wright was a black man with red hair. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 3:38 am
At issue in the latest edition of State v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 3:45 am
” State v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 4:59 pm
Com’n, 329 S.W.3d 353 (Ky. [read post]
4 May 2016, 10:55 am
March 25, 2016), BWP sued the HairTalk forum for users submitting celebrity photos showing hair styles. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 3:20 am
In State v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 10:31 pm
Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode: Zombie Righthaven Golan v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 3:35 am
Frye and Lafler v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:32 am
In State v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 3:45 am
Pettegrew, State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 3:38 am
Take State v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 3:43 am
The Ohio Supreme Court has been similarly inconsistent; in State v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 3:27 am
Last week’s solitary opinion came in Montana v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 3:24 am
The Supreme Court finished oral argument for the term this week, but the big news was the Court’s acceptance of certiorari in Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 2:59 am
(And keep in mind that in Davis v. [read post]
