Search for: "Com. v. Holder" Results 1 - 20 of 149
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2020, 11:49 am by Erin Napoleon
Guarding against the anticompetitive effect the PTO identifies, several doctrines ensure that registration of “Booking.com” would not yield its holder a monopoly on the term “booking. [read post]
12 May 2010, 1:03 pm by Evan Brown
Arizona State Trailer Sales, Inc. d/b/a Little Dealer Little Prices RV v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 4:31 am by Woodrow Pollack
A couple of weeks ago (according to Beck's complaint), someone registered the domain name: glennbeckrapedandmurderedayounggirlin1990.com. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 11:26 am by Jake Linford
The recent decision in Cartoon Network v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 7:56 am by christopher
448 F.3d 605 (2006) BILL GRAHAM ARCHIVES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:51 pm
This reasoning walks a fine line without providing any certainty for trade mark holders and future applicants as to where the protection of a word or concept begins and where it ends. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 2:08 am by gmlevine
The first appearance of a typographical error – omission of a dash in the trademark C-COM – was not recognized as such by the Complainant who alleged that was identical (rather than confusingly similar) to its trademark, Chernow Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 3:29 am by Russ Bensing
Holder, presents the issue of copyright law, including whether Section 514 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act violate the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]