Search for: "Com. v. Kelly, A." Results 21 - 40 of 42
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2009, 3:28 am
Finally, a reminder in Webber v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 6:52 pm by Steve
Pennsylvania Turnpike Com’n, 160 F.R.D. 51, 53 (E.D. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 1:19 pm by Eric
* The NYT catalogs an impressive roster of futility for US dot coms trying to compete in China. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(Spicy IP) Copyright in characters – III – Delhi High Court decision in Raja Pocket Books v Radha Pocket Books (Spicy IP)   Kenya Anti-Counterfeit Bill 2008 passed (Afro-IP) Kenya’s new anti-counterfeit legislation discussion (Afro-IP)   Kuwait Kuwait adopts international classes 42-45 (Kuwaitmark)   Macedonia New Industrial Property Law (Class 46)   Nigeria Court moves from Uyo to continue proceedings in New York in… [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 2:12 am
(IP finance) Existing sources of investment information failed us: patent landscaping analytics provide necessary innovation for investors (IP Asset Maximiser Blog) Global - Copyright Member states review key copyright issues (WIPO) (IPKat) (Daily Dose of IP) (Intellectual Property Watch) Curt Smith discusses cc-licensing (creativecommons.org) Kelly Link on creative commons (creativecommons.org) Africa EU-Africa partnership aims at knowledge access, technology transfer (Intellectual… [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
  Shame about the IP: (Afro-IP),Ethiopia receives US trade mark for Sidamo coffee despite opposition from Starbucks: (The IP Factor), (Afro-IP),CC licensed test for African sleeping sickness: (creativecommons.org),Update on PCT applications filed in Nigeria: (Afro-IP),Parallel imports of DVDs to be tested in South Africa: Universal City Studios v Mr Video: (Afro-IP),The W****D C*P of 2*1*: FIFA’s intellectual property rights in South Africa: (Afro-IP),Namibia to adopt… [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:28 am by judith
Over the past couple of years, there has been a great deal of discussion — particularly in relation to the Durham Statement [1] — about technical standards and preservation issues for law reviews that publish openly and exclusively online. [read post]