Search for: "Com. v. Kindness" Results 61 - 80 of 355
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2020, 10:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Protection v. enforcement: even if protected as a TM, the scope may be limited. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 7:41 am by Vandenack Weaver LLC
” The Court underscored that because domain names are one of a kind, a significant portion of the public will always understand a generic “.com” term to refer to a specific business. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 10:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Could make the entire survey about .com terms, so all the educational section and examples would be about .com. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by John Gregory
An overlap of e-signatures and Internet voting presented some legal challenges in Australia, leading to a decision I found problematic in a 2014 case comment on Getup Ltd v Elections Commissioner. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 1:27 pm
See also Tr. of Oral Arg. 5 (“Because domain names are one of a kind, a significant portion of the public will always understand a generic ‘.com’ term to refer to a specific business . . . . [read post]
26 May 2020, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Under Article 22 of the Treaty, companies seeking to challenge the DST can make three kinds of claims depending on their status. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 2:04 pm by Comunicaciones_MJ
And not being restricted to judicial proceedings, it extended to any other kind of governmental inquiry such as a legislative investigation. [read post]