Search for: "Com. v. Long" Results 61 - 80 of 913
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2018, 1:56 pm
(See Stats. 1973, ch. 1007, § 8, p. 2004; Stats. 1972, ch. 1122, § 13, p. 2156; see generally Industrial Welfare Com. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 8:24 pm by sunnysc
Image:  msjd.jpg    Photo Credit: www.mybudget360.com Last month, the Wall Street Journal reported that only 55% of 2011 law graduates had secured full-time, long-term jobs that required a law degree (see here for full article). [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:37 am by Russ Bensing
  The case, of course, was the Supreme Court’s long-awaited decision last week in Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
Corbitt… In State v. [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 5:00 pm
Some 38,000 owners were awarded $2,700 each; that’s a whopping $102.6 million in damages.Talk about getting souped up ….# # #SOURCE:https://www.law360.com/articles/1537233/breaking-gm-hit-with-over-100m-verdict-in-engine-defect-class-actionSiqueiros v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 2:23 pm by Robert Chesney, Steve Vladeck
Well, it’s simple: give $5 or more to Casa Marianella, forward the emailed receipt that you get from them to ThisIsTheWay@strausscenter.org (.org, not .com!) [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 6:06 pm
Now, in an unique moment of silence, of which it is sure to be interrupted, the AmeriKat has set out the tail of the Stanford v Roche patent assignment case, which was decided by the US Supreme Court on 6 June 2011. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 3:07 am by Russ Bensing
  Instead, Justice Thomas will give his customary long-winded dissertation greeting the assembled masses. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:37 pm by Bill Araiza
From the Religion Clause blog (via my co-author Tom Baker) coms news of Nieto v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 5:21 am by Jack Bogdanski
"Ed Johnson, the long-time Oregon Law Center lawyer in the Portland case, was also the plaintiffs’ lawyer in the recent Grants Pass case that extended the rule adopted by the Ninth Circuit in the notorious decision Martin v. [read post]