Search for: "Com. v. Markman" Results 1 - 6 of 6
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2014, 10:34 am
Further, the EMG signals detected by the two electrode pairs are to be “of substan­tially equal magnitude and phase” so that the difference amplifier will “produce a substantially zero [EMG] signal” upon subtracting the signals from one another.Nautilus, Inc. at *4-5 (internal citations omitted).Markman HearingIn 2011, the District Court conducted a hearing to determine the proper construction of the patent’s claims, see Markman v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 8:00 am
(Techdirt) Friendster granted social networking patent (Saunders & Silverstein) Partial win for both Cordance and Amazon in ‘one click’ Markman order (Law360) Leon Stambler launches patent suit against numerous major banks over their secure online banking services; Federal judge approves dismissal of UBS Financial Services (Law360) (Law360) Federal judge denies Girafa’s motion for preliminary injunction in lawsuit accusing Yahoo, Amazon and others of… [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(Spicy IP) Copyright in characters – III – Delhi High Court decision in Raja Pocket Books v Radha Pocket Books (Spicy IP)   Kenya Anti-Counterfeit Bill 2008 passed (Afro-IP) Kenya’s new anti-counterfeit legislation discussion (Afro-IP)   Kuwait Kuwait adopts international classes 42-45 (Kuwaitmark)   Macedonia New Industrial Property Law (Class 46)   Nigeria Court moves from Uyo to continue proceedings in New York in… [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 11:05 am
interview: (IP tango) Events 7 July: PLI briefing webcast ‘Life after Quanta v LGE: What every patent lawyer needs to know’: (PLI), 7-15 July/16-18 July: 2nd Transatlantic IP summer academy, modules one and two – Alicante/Milan: (IPKat), 9 July 2008: ALI & ABA webcast ‘Quanta v LG: What you should know’: (Patent Docs), 11 July: CIPA moot to improve participants’ understanding of procedures of EPO Technical… [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 4:00 am
Justice Michel Bastarache, of the Supreme Court of Canada, criticized that court for the 2004 decisions in the Monsanto Canada Inc. v. [read post]