Search for: "Com. v. McKenna"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2020, 10:25 am
Protection v. enforcement: even if protected as a TM, the scope may be limited. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:02 pm
WINN v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 2:50 pm
Idea was: glut in dot-com space. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:21 pm
If process claims are available, and relevant to consumers, in many more contexts than previously realized, among other things that has implications for the First Amendment treatment of advertising regulation—compare the claims made in the Nike v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 1:53 pm
By Eric Goldman [This post is composed of three parts. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 11:31 am
Rearden LLC v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 9:37 am
via CMS Cameron McKenna LLP Mitre House 160 Aldersgate Street London EC1A 4DD United Kingdom Case: Grisbrook v MGN Ltd and others [2010] EWCA Civ 139 Newspaper online archives are now further fertile ground for UK IP and copyright solicitors and barristers seeking plainitff driven photographic copyrght infringement claims. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 7:16 am
(direct v. contributory), and (3) what remedies do the intermediaries face? [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
(Laura Empson of Cass Business School gave a particularly nice presentation on this at lunchtime Thursday, positing that useful ways of thinking about partnership might be as analogous to The Three Musketeers, to Henry V's famous "band of brothers" speech before the Battle of Agincourt, to a buccaneer pirate ship, or, at last, to "Gone With the Wind. [read post]
