Search for: "Com. v. Peters" Results 1 - 20 of 126
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2022, 10:45 am by Mark Ashton
Peter Stanley sued stating that he was entitled to a hearing on the subject of who would have custody of children that were his. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 6:29 pm
– Megan Ma (Sciences Po/Stanford University)Discussant: Gregory Lewkowicz (ULB)Paper: Catala: Moving Towards the Future of Legal Expert Systems, Denis Merigoux (INRIA), Liane Huttner (Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne)Discussant: Rajaa el Hamdani (Télécom Paris)Paper: Ant, an annotation software for RegTech, Raphaël Gyori (ULB)Discussant: Damien Charlotin (AI Reporter/ University of Cambridge)Lunch –11.45am – 1.00pmPanel V… [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 11:32 am by Eleonora Rosati
Bentley v Bentley: Clothing beats Motors again in the Court of AppealBentley Motors Limited v (1) Bentley 1962 Limited (2) Brandlogic Limited [2020] EWCA Civ 1726 (December 2020) This was the first ever case featured in Retromark and turned up again in Volume 7. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 2:41 am
COM decisionSupreme Court Decisions: Supreme Court Sends BOOKING.COM Attorney's Fees Ruling Back to Fourth Circuit In View of Peter v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
Booking.com, which asks whether the addition of “.com” to a generic term creates a protectable trademark, and Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 3:49 am by Edith Roberts
First up is Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
At Slate, David Gans argues that “[t]he sweeping arguments for a total religious exemption” in Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]